Monday, January 30, 2012

Depend spring 2012

Late on this, but better that, than never, right? Here's what Swedish nail care brand Depend is offering us for spring, in terms of color. This collection contains 11 colors and a matte topcoat.




Unfortunately, low light is all Sweden has to offer this time of year, but the colors here are pretty accurate.

Let's take a look at the wheel, and we might just find something interesting. Or..?

Do you see that? Yes. Eight of these are mattes. Semi-matte, but still. Eight! Only three glossy shades to choose from.

Now, let's see what we can expect from the matte topcoat. Here over the three glossy shades.

Yeah. So...

Yeah. where do I begin? This is by far the most terrible collection I had to review. Let's talk about the colors first. I do realize that pastel like shades are back this spring, and yes, that's painful for me personally, but these shades... Some of them aren't even pretty in theory. 298, 302, and 303 (the latter referred to as "band-aid colored" by fellow Swedish blogger Nailtastic) stand out as the worst color lab mishaps of the year (and it's only just begun!). Let's be fair: some of the shades are good, 299 might even be really pretty, but none of the better shades are very inventive or fresh. And then there are good shades that have that semi-matte thing going on, and if you'd by any chance like your manicure glossy, that frost finish they're made from will be revealed.

The last time I reviewed a Depend collection with quite a large bulk of these semi-matte shades, my verdict was a lot more positive. There's a reason for that. I believe this is the third, or perhaps even fourth, collection where Depend includes this finish - and this time with a total of them that exceeds all the previous together. It's just too much. In the accompanying press release, they state that mattes are still going strong among nail trends, but the Depend peeps and I must be looking for way different sources. I'm sad that Depend didn't catch up on the again exploding flakie trend, like they did when they released 156 during the last flakie boom, and while pretty much every brand releases a shitload of flakies that make lacqueristas all over the world giddy, Depend releases ...eight more frost struck semi-mattes.

Let's skip to the matte topcoat. Again, while most brands released matte topcoats in 2009 and 2010, Depend does so in 2012. Together with a collection that consists to 70 % of matte shades. I don't follow their logic, but okay. So, what's it like, performance wise?

Well, those of you who were around before the new generation of matte topcoats may remember using certain ridge filling basecoats as substitutes. This is pretty much the exact same feeling Depend's matte topcoat will give you. It's thick, and slightly whitening, it alters the color underneath into a lighter shade. See the last photo, compare the colors to the un-mattified versions on the wheel above.

I don't like being this mean, but this is a terrible collection. Three okay (but frosty) shades in the matte division (294, 295, 301), a decent staple among the glossy ones (300), and one pretty shade (299) that could be worth picking up if you're short on good periwinkle cremes. Not even two greens saves anything. And there used to be a time when Depend did colors that I would stock up on, buy a large pile and forward to international friends, such as 156 (pink jelly flakie) and 170 (super greyed blue creme). They were fast on picking up the army green trend, to my personal content. But this... Let's hope for a better fall for this brand.

Swedish word of the day:
matt -adjective I matte II weak, dull
Too many mattes makes me weak...

14 comments:

  1. I actually like almost all the shades 'blushing'
    What kind of brush do they have? I mean, are they worth buying (because here are a bit pricey depending how small they are)?
    Thanks

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Haha, it's okay! It's agood thing we're all different. :) I usually like the Depend formula, but the semi-mattes are a wee bit more difficult, but manageable. The brush is fine, too.

      Delete
  2. I honestly see a few I really like but then again I change my polish every other day. I wouldn't mind more matte shades except it shouldve been all matte or more proportional. Were you sent these or were they purchased? The bottles look small.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. These were sent for reviewing purposes. Although, original bottle size - 5 ml. Retail price for Depend lacquers here are 25 SEK, which is approx US$3.50.

      Delete
  3. YES! I love that you have the guts to say "these colors are terrible". I most definitely agree. Apart from the fact that I simply can't get excited about all pastel collections in spring anymore, I really think those are pretty awful colors.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Oh my! I have to admit that I have a crush for mattes these days and I am actually loving this collection! Is Depend a cheap or expensive brand?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, they are not very expensive, but on the other hand the bottles aren't very big.

      Delete
  5. First of all: by the look of the color wheel I really like shade 299. It's the only one that looks original and pretty. I also like 294, 295, 300 and 301, but I think I've seen these shades before. I don't get it. Why release a matte top coat when the majority of the collection are mattes by themselves? Yeah, I hear you. Not the best one, Depend!

    ReplyDelete
  6. I love 295, maybe I have to buy it!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Your review was really helpful.
    I do agree that those colors are not very "fresh" looking.
    I am surprised at the color change from before and after the matte coat was put on. The 292, though, I think is still pretty either way haha.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I actually like the blue and the green matte. I don't have mattes like that. Other than that, nothing groundbreaking. I remember last year I went loco over Depend spring. I love your review being so honest! I'm not sure if we'll get the spring collection, I didn't see the Fall one anywhere, if I do, I'll probably grab the menitoned two, if not, it's no biggie. And the matte TC is really late, that was my biggest surprise in the bunch, really.

    ReplyDelete
  9. If I had to buy one of these it would be 299 but I think I'll pass even that one.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Håller med, det är den sämsta kollektion jag sett från Depend på länge och då är det ändå ett tag sedan de var helt på tåget. Men, vi håller tummarna för att de återhämtar sig. Kanske kan de plocka in någon ny, het förmåga på produktutvecklingsavdelningen eller var de nu bestämmer om nästa kollektions färger och finisher.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Well, since I reside in the states you would think I never would end up with any of this brand. Oddly there is a corner of my stash of colors that were tossed into boxes I got from eBay wins as extras. I usually end up passing them on to others. But among my ? part of my stash are 2 bottles of Depend. Who would have thought it was a Swedish brand? I never even looked it up - the color was blaugh and I just figured it was a drugstore buy of a brand that never hits my area. Little did I know how far these bottles had traveled! Have to say nothing really is outstanding to my eye in this new spring collection - kind of like what's in the couple bottles I have - nothing I need or would have bought.

    ReplyDelete

Thank you so much for commenting! Please, NO LINK SPAMMING! Anonymous comments with rude contents, advertising and/or link dropping will be deleted.