Monday, October 4, 2010

The Glitter Gal holo hunt part 1

This is white 712 from Glitter Gal. I've been meaning to swatch this ever since Evil Angel wrote about it and made her own version, I finally got around to it this weekend.





When I first got this I thought it was supposed to be a holo polish so I was disappointed by the lack of holo effect but when I look at the Glitter Gal site I see that the 3D range is divided into a Holo (labeled H) and a Sparkle collection (labeled S). It's a bit confusing because I have four polishes from Glitter Gal and they are all labeled GGNP (Glitter Gal Nail polish?) so I don´t know if this is supposed to be a holo or a sparkle polish. I got my Glitter Gals more than a year ago so this divison could be a new thing. As you can see in the pictures, the bottle only contains 9 ml so this polish is kinda pricey. This is a bumpy white/light pink with iridescent glitter. I like the glow but hate the bumps. I also hate the condition of my hands right now and the fact that it's monday...

I'll show you the other three Glitter Gals later this week.

Swedish word of the day:
besviken -adjective disappointed
I hate bumps.

13 comments:

  1. I would be disappointed with this as well! I am not a fan of the glitter chunks in this polish. I am with you, I like the glow but hate the bumps!

    -Alexis

    ReplyDelete
  2. I knew this would be bumpy just by looking at the bottle. =(

    ReplyDelete
  3. Vaddå, gillar du detta skira vitrosa lack eller har du frankenplaner?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Nej, jag tyckte nog att det såg lite finare ut på min iphone än på min laptopskärm. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hehehe, ok. Jag kan tänka mig en swap annars, kolla igen på din iphone vettja!

    ReplyDelete
  6. awwww... it really looks gorgeous on the bottle. :(
    thanks for this "warning" LOL

    http://abbiespurpleroom.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete
  7. Mitt inlägg om det här lacket ligger i mitt arkiv sedan en evighet men jag publicerar aldrig. Undrar varför? Jag håller med dig alla fall, det är ett lite trist lack om det är holo man är ute efter. Men det har kvaliteter också, som den rosa flashen t.ex. Det skulle kunna vara intressant om man inte ville ha holo, liksom,

    ReplyDelete
  8. Men alltså, om man lägger den över ett vitt lack, och drar på skitmycket topplack, blir det inte snyggare då då? Även om fortf inte holo.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I thought it was going to be a white holo too, I was slightly disappointed when I realized mine was more glitter than holo. But now that I see it on the nail its dang pretty and I think its ok that its glitter and holo :) Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Huh. I've been wanting to franken a white holo too and you know I didn't even look at GG holo line, although I did have to differentiate for the holo and sparkle line for my contest this week because I had two different polishes, one from the holo and one from the sparkle! I was glad I looked at that. I wouldn't like this, it's not quite what I was wanting.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Sminkan - jag har CND Glow som är ett jättebra layering-lack om man vill ha den där solskensrosa flashen men utan glittret.

    Feline - frågan är om det är värt besväret, även om man kör på mkt topcoat tycker jag att det ser ut som att glittret står ut typ.

    Jess and Nicole - Well, I'm not even sure this is supposed to be a holo or a sparkle since it's marked with GGNP instead of H or S. I wanted a white holo but I've would of liked this even without the holo effect if it wasn't so damn bumpy!

    ReplyDelete
  12. I understand you being disappointed with this polish. But apart from the bumpyness, it is really pretty!

    ReplyDelete

Thank you so much for commenting! Please, NO LINK SPAMMING! Anonymous comments with rude contents, advertising and/or link dropping will be deleted.